LIVE WIRE
Home/Comparisons/Crumbl vs Insomnia Cookies
Head-to-Head Franchise Intelligence

Crumbl vs Insomnia Cookies

Commercial comparison of unit economics, FTC Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) Item 19 average unit volume (AUV), startup capital requirements, and store tech stacks.

Contender 1Rank #55

Crumbl

Rotating Specialty Cookies

Taste Weekly

Parent Holding:Sawyer Hemsley & Jason McGowan
Contender 2Rank #166

Insomnia Cookies

Desserts, Bakery & Treats

Sweet Treats & Artisan Confections

Parent Holding:Independent Private

Unit Economics & Financial Benchmarks

Verified against FTC FDD Item 19 and SEC Form 10-K regulatory disclosures.

MetricCrumblInsomnia CookiesAdvantage
Median AUV (Annual Sales)$1.31M$4.01MInsomnia Cookies (+206%)
Active Store Locations1,101352Crumbl (Larger Fleet)
Initial Investment Range$380k – $850k$2.20M – $4.80MVaries by site format
Min Liquid Capital Required$200k$750kFDD Item 7 Requirement
Royalty Fee %8.0%4.5%Insomnia Cookies (Lower Fee)
National Ad Fund %2.0%3.0%Marketing Contribution
Annual Systemwide Sales$1.40B$1.40BSystem Scale

In-Store Tech Stack

Point-of-Sale Hardware/Software
Crumbl:Toast POS / Crumbl In-House
Insomnia Cookies:Toast Restaurant POS
Kitchen Display System (KDS)
Crumbl:Crumbl Baker Make-Line
Insomnia Cookies:Micros KDS

Delivery Multi-Homing

DoorDash Marketplace Penetration
Crumbl:0% (0 stores)
Insomnia Cookies:0% (0 stores)
Uber Eats Marketplace Penetration
Crumbl:0% (0 stores)
Insomnia Cookies:0% (0 stores)

Need deeper store-level datasets?

Explore individual geocoded address lists, multi-unit franchisee portfolios, and full FDD Item 19 exhibits.